How can public health initiatives or legal measures be enhanced or developed to tackle vaccine misinformation?  

Robert Malone stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, proudly exclaiming, “Regarding the genetic COVID vaccines, the science is settled,” as he announced to the audience “They are not working.” followed by roaring applause by thousands of anti-vaccine and anti-mandate demonstrators during the pandemic. Malone, who played a key role in developing mRNA vaccines, has become one of the most controversial voices of the movement against coronavirus vaccines, amassing a large following supporting his stance. However, his claims have been discredited by scientific research and medical professionals as absurd and lethal, and Twitter banned him for violating the platform’s coronavirus misinformation policy. [4]

 

However, the ‘trend’ has already set the stone. Despite over 5.55 billion people around the world having received the vaccine, there was significant pushback from communities regarding the vaccines being used as bioweapons, containing microchips, and causing autism. Although it was previously debunked that vaccines do not cause autism [9], and with no proper evidence of microchipping, this misinformation was disseminated rapidly through social media platforms. As a result, many individuals refused to be vaccinated and encouraged others not to receive vaccinations as well, resulting in approximately 232,000 preventable deaths.

 

Could these incidents have been avoided if better initiatives or legal measures were in place to promptly discredit such baseless myths when they come under public scrutiny?

 

Undeniably, enhancing public health initiatives is critical to combating vaccine misconceptions and allowing the public to understand the benefits of vaccines. Specifically, developing outreach campaigns to address vaccine misconceptions, while utilizing trusted healthcare providers as messengers could bolster vaccine confidence in hesitant communities [2] and minimise vaccine misinformation. One notable example is the Korean public health authority, as they began the campaign under the social marketing approach during the COVID-19 pandemic, projecting “herd immunity” through social media platforms through positive stimulation in vaccine-acceptance behaviours. Moreover, it recommended that everyone be immunized against SARS-CoV-2, and encouraged the public to embrace new behaviours, such as vaccine uptakes, and avoid antisocial vaccine delays or not getting vaccinated. Despite being based on voluntary cooperation, the study found that the campaign effectively increased voluntary uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine in Korea, and previous prevalences of vaccine hesitancy, delay, or refusal significantly decreased. After the initiative, about 94.8% of Korean citizens over the age of 12 had completed their second dose, which was considered high immunization coverage. As a result, it is undeniable that outreach platforms play a significant role in mitigating vaccine information. [5]

 

In addition, investing in health education programs that teach media literacy skills significantly aids public identification of vaccine misinformation [5]. A significant example would be telehealth services, which have been on the constant rise after the pandemic. It generally comprises elements such as teleconsultation, which are remote peer-to-peer support consultations between medical professionals and patients, as well as tele-support, which is the use of online services to provide advice for support patients and carers. [6] These services empower patients and carers by offering accessible health education and decision-making options, ultimately enhancing patients' self-care competence [7]. In light of the above benefits, many institutions started to establish a dedicated policy in the 2010s for the progress of telehealth services. According to the 2015 survey conducted by the World Health Organization, 58% of the responding member countries indicated that they had devised a strategy for telehealth. For instance, Singapore has guided the development of telehealth services as the early guide by providing guidelines and refining the regulatory regime since the mid-2010s. In a similar vein, the Australian government launched the Telehealth Pilots Programme in 2012 to subsidize selected telehealth service projects to identify opportunities for extending the application of telehealth services [8]. In summary, such programmes are a part of public health initiatives and play a key part in addressing vaccine misinformation.

 

Extending with regards to how legal measures can be implemented to address vaccine misinformation, consumer protection laws could be strengthened to prevent the sale of fraudulent vaccine-related products [1], which drastically reduces the availability of misinformation-fueled “treatments”. This could be executed by increasing the transparency and disclosure requirements of alternative treatments by requiring vaccine manufacturers to provide detailed and easy-to-understand information regarding the composition, safety, and efficacy of their products, as well as mandating the disclosure of all clinical trial data, including any side effects, to allow for viable verification. Moreover, enhanced post-market surveillance and adverse event reporting can be established through a well-funded system for monitoring vaccine-related adverse events, with clear guidelines for consumers and healthcare providers to report any issues, and post obligatory requirements to vaccine manufacturers to regularly update product information and safety reports once new data becomes available.

 

The consumer protection laws could also enforce stricter oversight and vaccine regulation by ensuring that vaccines are only distributed and administered through licensed and accredited healthcare providers, with clear training protocols. Additionally, accessible information could be provided to consumers about their rights and the available legal recourse in the event of vaccine-related injuries, and a streamlined compensation system can be established for individuals who suffer vaccine-related injuries and have received vaccine doses, with transparent eligibility criteria. With the above measures, it can not only build trust with the public on how beneficial vaccines are but also mitigate any possible fraudulent products by deterring intentional propagation of false claims, such that situations, where 223 products fraudulent vaccines were released into the market during the COVID-19 pandemic [10], will not occur again.

 

Ultimately, it is evident that the above initiatives and measures are crucial in mitigating vaccine misinformation once refined and implemented. Nonetheless, it is still essential that individuals also play a part on their own, such as learning how to identify and avoid sharing health misinformation and address so with their friends, family and the community. With our efforts, more deaths can be prevented and the livelihood of our community can be maintained.

 

In a world swayed by whispers of fear, let our truthful voices rise like a rallying cry against tides of misinformation.

 

​

-
 

​

Citations  

[1] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Health misinformation—current priorities of the U.S. Surgeon General \[Internet\]. www.hhs.gov. 2021\. Available from: [https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/priorities/health-misinformation/index.html](https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/priorities/health-misinformation/index.html)  

​

[2]Fogarty E. A Strategy to Tackle Public Health Misinformation | AHA News \[Internet\]. www.aha.org. 2023\. Available from: [https://www.aha.org/news/healthcareinnovation-blog/2023-05-30-strategy-tackle-public-health-misinformation](https://www.aha.org/news/healthcareinnovation-blog/2023-05-30-strategy-tackle-public-health-misinformation)  

​

[3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Building Confidence in COVID-19 Vaccines | CDC \[Internet\]. www.cdc.gov. 2021\. Available from: [https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/vaccinate-with-confidence.html](https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/vaccinate-with-confidence.html)  

​

[4] Bella T. A vaccine scientist’s discredited claims have bolstered a movement of misinformation. Washington Post \[Internet\]. 2022 Jan 24; Available from: [https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/01/24/robert-malone-vaccine-misinformation-rogan-mandates/](https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/01/24/robert-malone-vaccine-misinformation-rogan-mandates/)  

​

[5] Hong SA. COVID-19 vaccine communication and advocacy strategy: a social marketing campaign for increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake in South Korea. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023 Mar 16;10(1):1–9.  

​

[6] Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region \- Development of telehealth services \[Internet\]. Legco.gov.hk. 2018 \[cited 2024 Aug 1\]. Available from: [https://www.legco.gov.hk/research-publications/english/essentials-2021ise14-development-of-telehealth-services.htm\#endnote4](https://www.legco.gov.hk/research-publications/english/essentials-2021ise14-development-of-telehealth-services.htm\#endnote4)  

​

[7] WHO-ITU Global standard for accessibility of telehealth services \[Internet\]. World Health Organization. World Health Organization and International Telecommunication Union; 2022 \[cited 2024 Aug 1\]. Available from: [https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/356160/9789240050464-eng.pdf?sequence=1](https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/356160/9789240050464-eng.pdf?sequence=1)  

 

[8] Hall Dykgraaf S, Desborough J, de Toca L, Davis S, Roberts L, Munindradasa A, et al. “A decade’s worth of work in a matter of days”: The journey to telehealth for the whole population in Australia. International Journal of Medical Informatics \[Internet\]. 2021 Jul;151(151):104483. Available from: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103781/](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103781/)  

 

[9] Knopf A. Time to remember: Vaccines don’t cause autism. The Brown University Child and Adolescent Behavior Letter. 2021 Jun 7;37(7):9–10.  

 

[10] 1.Affairs O of R. Fraudulent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Products. FDA \[Internet\]. 2020 Oct 8; Available from: [https://www.fda.gov/consumers/health-fraud-scams/fraudulent-coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-products](https://www.fda.gov/consumers/health-fraud-scams/fraudulent-coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-products)